Thank you very much, guys. I've retooled this one a bit, so I'll have to re-up it (is this possible, ZM?).
ZM: The 17-35 is a big, bulky beast of a lens, but they're a huge pleasure to use. I bought mine second hand already converted to EOS mount by Bo-Ming. These would be perfect lenses if it weren't for their resolution degradation ellipse. Not that it is a deal-breaker or anything.
Andreas: That's the exact switch I made, and I've only 'regretted' it once--when shooting in Arches National Park in Utah in a snow/hail/rain/thunder/lightning storm. The weather sealed nature of the 17-40 would have been nice, and I wasn't sure that the Zeiss would take the weather so nicely.
Thanks, Stephen. As you can imagine, the resolving power of the 17-35 isn't accurately represented here. The more I look at this the more I want to rework it a bit: the DR doesn't seem quite right.
So simple, so well-composed. Great find and exposure.
Get your store banner on RealCapture.photo Send us an email to support@realcapture.photo
Support RealCapture.photo — Our community is free for everyone. If you value what we do, you can help cover our server and development costs with a small one time or monthly donation.