Andreas: That's the exact switch I made, and I've only 'regretted' it once--when shooting in Arches National Park in Utah in a snow/hail/rain/thunder/lightning storm. The weather sealed nature of the 17-40 would have been nice, and I wasn't sure that the Zeiss would take the weather so nicely.
Thanks, Stephen. As you can imagine, the resolving power of the 17-35 isn't accurately represented here. The more I look at this the more I want to rework it a bit: the DR doesn't seem quite right.
Load more
Hide conversation
Get your store banner on RealCapture.photo Send us an email to support@realcapture.photo
Support RealCapture.photo — Our community is free for everyone. If you value what we do, you can help cover our server and development costs with a small one time or monthly donation.
4
